Connect with us


U.S. Supreme Court to decide legality of census citizenship query



U.S. Supreme Court to decide legality of census citizenship query

Washington, Feb. 15, 2019 (Reuters/NNN) The U.S. Supreme Court will decide the fate of a fiercely contested plan by President Donald Trump’s administration to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

The court on Friday agreed to an expedited review of a judge’s ruling blocking the plan.

Time is of the essence in the case, as the official census forms are due to be printed in the coming months.


Opponents have accused the administration of trying to engineer an undercount of the true population and diminish the electoral representation of Democratic-leaning communities in Congress, benefiting Trump’s fellow Republicans.


Non-citizens comprise an estimated 7 per cent of people living in the U.S.


The U.S. Constitution mandates a census every 10 years.


The official population count is used in the allocation of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the distribution of billions of dollars in federal funds.


There has not been a census question about citizenship status since 1950.


Ross announced in March 2018 that the administration would include a citizenship question, saying the Justice Department had requested the data to help enforce the Voting Rights Act that protects eligible voters from discrimination.


Only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections while Trump has pursued hardline policies to limit legal and illegal immigration.


On Friday, Trump declared a national emergency in a bid to fund his promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border without congressional approval, a step he has called necessary to combat illegal immigration.


New York was one of the states suing the administration.


New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, said her office looks forward to defending the lower court victory at the high court, citing the “far-reaching and long-lasting effects” of a census undercount.


American Civil Liberties Union attorney Dale Ho, representing immigrant rights groups suing the administration, said adding a citizenship question would damage democracy.


“The evidence presented at trial exposed this was the Trump administration’s plan from the get-go,” Ho said.


The Justice Department did not immediately have a comment.


The administration has argued that it wants to reinstate a “wholly unremarkable demographic question about citizenship” as part of the census questionnaire.


It called Furman’s ruling “the first time the judiciary has ever dictated the contents of the decennial census questionnaire.”


In his ruling, Furman said the evidence showed that Ross and his aides “worked hard to generate” a request for the citizenship question from the Justice Department.


He also said that Ross made the decision in spite of Census Bureau evidence that such a question would lead to lower response rates for the census.


The judge found a “veritable smorgasbord” of violations of a law called the Administrative Procedure Act.


Democrats call the citizenship question part of a broader Republican effort at the federal and state level, also including voter-suppression measures and redrawing of electoral districts.


Democrats allege that it is to diminish the voting power of areas and groups that typically back Democratic candidates, including immigrants, Latinos and African-Americans. Republicans reject the accusation.


A decision by the justices to take up a case like this one before an appeal is handled by one of the regional federal appeals courts is rare.


According to the court’s rules, it takes up such requests only when the case is of “imperative public importance” warranting immediate review.


The last time it decided a case officially filed in advance of judgment by an appeals court was in 2005.


That case, during the President George W. Bush’s administration, involved a challenge to criminal sentencing guidelines.


The Supreme Court rejected an earlier Trump administration request to halt the New York trial that led to Furman’s later ruling.(Reuters/NNN)
Edited by Donald Ugwu

Load more

Contact US: editor[at], nnnnews247[at]

Recent Posts

February 2020
« Jan

NNN News Nigeria: NNN is an online Nigeria news portal that publishes breaking news in politics, business, entertainment, sport, security, features, opinion, environment, education, technology, and the world news at large. NNN publishes only news that is factual, credible, verifiable, authoritative and investigative. NNN is a media subscriber of the News Agency of Nigeria. NNN is a unique media organization that is founded in the spirit of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, comprising of ordinary people with an overriding commitment to seeking the truth and publishing it without fear or favor. Contact: editor[at]

© 2014 - 2019 NNN News Nigeria. All Rights Reserved.